� |
HOME
| �
December 09, 2004
The Mystery Publicist
A Brian Flemming's Weblog Investigation
News flash: If you loudly launch an anti-Christian movie project, you will get strange emails. Many of them will be insane rants, thousands of words long. Others will simply contain one word, "devil," with no further explanation.
But a few will be more intriguing than that, if you are as easily intrigued as I am.
At 12:30 a.m. Pacific Time on Sunday, I received this message from the address "pmk@publicist.com":
From: "PMK HBH" (pmk@publicist.com)
To: Brian Flemming
Subject: Client inquiry
Although it may be too late, I apologize for the slow response. I understand that someone from your company made an inquiry a few months ago regarding getting in touch with actress Majandra Delfino (Roswell) and former olympian turned actor Rey-Phillip Santos (Dark Angel, Blade 2) for possible roles in one of your upcoming feature film projects titled "The Beast". Ms. Delfino and Mr. Santos are not repped by our company. But I do have their contact information, Ill be sure to forward your contacts to their representatives. Or you can try checking their current agent contacts at www.imdb.com for your convenience, but I suggest you try contacting them directly, rather than going through us.
Good Luck,
Emily Berger - PMK/HBH
Some facts:
1. Nobody associated with The Beast contacted PMK/HBH (one of the biggest publicity firms in the entertainment industry) about any actors.
2. I just called PMK and asked to be connected to Emily Berger. The receptionist said nobody by that name works there, in any capacity.
3. The email message does not appear to originate from PMK. The domain "publicist.com" allows anyone to sign up anonymously for a free email account (like Yahoo or Hotmail do). It is not actually associated with any publicity firm.
4. The content of the message is odd, given its stated premise. If I already specifically inquired about these actors, why would Emily Berger refer to their credits and attributes in this way? This is like bad exposition in a movie--one character telling another information that the other presumably already knows.
5. Publicists are the laziest people in the world. It is virtually impossible that a publicist would be working late Saturday night sending emails on behalf of people who aren't even clients. (Plus, both performers' difficult names are spelled correctly--no way did a publicist write this.) The only element militating for authenticity is the opener. It is plausible that a publicist would fail to get back to somebody for months.
I wrote back to Ms. Berger ("CD" stands for "casting director"):
Emily,
Thanks for writing. I'm pretty sure our CD didn't make that contact with you, though. Probably a prankster. This project gets a lot of that sort of thing.
Sorry for the trouble.
Best,
Brian Flemming
And she wrote back to me:
Thanks for clearing that up. I went ahead and forwarded your contact information to them just in case one of them is interested in fure projects.
:)Emily
And that's the extent of our communication to date.
So...who is Emily Berger?
--An overzealous fan of Majandra Delfino who believes (perhaps correctly) that Delfino would be a good candidate to play Danielle in The Beast?
--A friend of mine who thought (correctly) that I might enjoy browsing the pictures of Delfino at IMDb?
--A fan of Rey-Phillip Santos who believes that Santos would be a fine candidate to play...I dunno?
--Someone who thought (incorrectly) that I might enjoy browsing the picture of Rey-Phillip Santos at IMDb?
Although it will surely invite a torrent of spam, I am enabling comments to allow public speculation on this mystery.
Also, any suggestions as to what I should write next to Emily Berger are appreciated.
COMMENTS
Aw, come on, Brian. Surely you can come up with something about her auditioning! And of course, there are all the call-backs. And call-backs. And call-backs.
Susan | December 9, 2004 03:22 PM
(Psssst. I suspect that ol' Emily is putting the moves on you.)
Susan | December 9, 2004 03:26 PM
Brian,
This is very strange, but I suspect quite mild compared to a lot of what you will get/have gotten thus far. Good luck with this project.
John
Thanks, John.
Susan--Emily has an odd approach, but I'll keep my mind open.
Last night someone wrote me an email just saying "You're mean."
I wonder if it's about this entry.
Is this mean?
Brian,
I wonder if perhaps usage of "mean" is using the definition as "average". Such as "the mean of the numbers is 12".
Regardless, you are neither mean nor average.
You must give the author a bit of credit, though, because they wrote "You're mean" rather than "Your mean" as so many as apt to do.
As for Ms. Emily, I think you ought to e-mail back with the ol' playing stupid approach.... "I must have misunderstood something because I attempted to reach you by phone and was unable." See what kind of response that invokes.
Come to think of it, I don't suppose she is now trying to tell the actors that she represents you. Just a thought.
I still think she has the hots for you.
Susan | December 10, 2004 03:11 PM
P.S. It feels so good to have comments back.
Susan | December 10, 2004 03:12 PM
Kerik just stepped down because of an illegal nanny. Go here for more info: www.politicalthought.net
Igor | December 10, 2004 08:29 PM
Uh, okay. Thanks, Igor.
Susan--actually, she did write "your." I just corrected it because I find "[sic]" distracting.
I correct spelling and punctuation in most of the hostile readers' messages I post here, as a matter of fact, especially if it's just one or two minor instances.
Oh, I just realized. I didn't do any correcting on Ms. Berger's work because presenting the unaltered text seemed important to the investigation.
Susan is Emily ... and she's hitting on you
So - is there anything additional to report with Ms. Emily? Is there anyone who can hack publicist.com and get any info?
Interesting that it sounds like most of your hostile messages have errors, be they spelling or grammar. Kinda makes you wonder about intelligence levels of the type of person that would send such a message, doesn't it?
Speaking of intelligence levels - and off the subject of Ms. Emily, I'm reading The End of Faith. Quite simply: awesome!
I may just start praying to Sam Harris.
Susan | December 13, 2004 04:31 PM
Mercutio,
Thanks for the compliment, but I'm an Old Broad. I'm not sure I'd even remember HOW to hit on someone unless it's meant literally.
Susan | December 13, 2004 04:37 PM
poker online - poker books, texas hold'em poker | poker stars - texas holdem poker, texas hold'em | free poker online - empire poker, poker tables | poker tips - poker online, poker rooms | poker chips - poker chips, empire poker | party poker - world series of poker, poker online | texas hold'em poker - texas hold'em poker, texas hold'em | party poker - WPT, poker tables | online poker rooms - poker supplies, pacific poker | poker online - texas holdem poker, texas holdem poker | online poker - poker, empirepoker
Post a comment
(Name, email and URL fields optional)
HOME
|